Photo: Europe: 31,000-year-old burial holds world’s oldest known identical twins

The twin infants’ double burial was unearthed in Krems am Wachtberg, Austria.

An ancient grave in Austria may represent the oldest burial of twins on record, a new study finds.

The 31,000-year-old burial dates to the Upper Paleolithic (a period lasting from 40,000 to 10,000 years ago), also known as the Old Stone Age. One of the infants died shortly after childbirth, while his twin brother lived for about 50 days, or just over 7 weeks, according to analyses of both babies.

A third infant, a 3-month-old, interred in a burial about 5 feet (1.5 meters) away is likely their cousin, according to the research, published online Nov. 6 in the journal Communications Biology.

Researchers found the twins’ oval-shaped burial at the archaeological site of Krems-Wachtberg, on the bank of the Danube River by the town center of Krems in 2005. The twin infants’ remains were covered with ochre, a red pigment often used in ancient burials across the world. The double burial also contained 53 beads made out of mammoth ivory that were likely once threaded on a necklace, and a perforated fox incisor and three perforated mollusks, which were possibly necklace pendants, the researchers said. A mammoth shoulder blade placed over the burial protected the small bodies interred beneath it over the millennia.

The nearby burial of the other infant also contained ochre, as well as a 3-inch-long (8 centimeters) mammoth-ivory pin, which may have fastened a leather garment together at the time of burial, the researchers said.

The finding made headlines shortly after its discovery, and researchers even created a replica of the twins’ burial, which went on display at the Natural History Museum Vienna in 2013. However, scientists still had much to learn about the ancient burial. So, in the new project, an interdisciplinary group of researchers teamed up to decipher the relationship between these three infants and to determine their sex and age at death.

The study is the first on record to use ancient DNA to confirm twins in the archaeological record, the researchers said. And not just any twins, but identical twins.

This is the "earliest proof of a twin birth," study senior researcher Ron Pinhasi, an associate professor in the Department of Evolutionary Biology at the University of Vienna, said in a statement (translated from German with Google Translate). Researchers don’t know how common twin births were during the Upper Paleolithic (the rate fluctuates by region and time), but today, twins (both identical and fraternal) happen in about one in 85 births, while identical twins are born in about one in 250 births.

"To discover a multiple burial from the Paleolithic period is a specialty in itself," study lead researcher Maria Teschler-Nicola, a biologist at the Natural History Museum Vienna, said in the statement. "The fact that sufficient and high-quality old DNA could be extracted from the fragile child’s skeletal remains for a genome analysis exceeded all of our expectations and can be compared to a lottery ticket."

A genetic analysis of the third infant revealed that he was a third-degree male relative, likely a cousin, the researchers found.

The twins’ bodies were covered with the red pigment ochre.

A replica of the double burial on display at Natural History Museum Vienna. (Image credit: Kurt Kracher/© NHM Vienna)
To determine at what age the babies died, the researchers looked at each baby’s top second incisor. The team paid special attention to the so-called "newborn line," a dark line in the tooth enamel that separates the enamel formed prenatally from that formed after birth, Teschler-Nicola said.

Those newborn lines, as well the infants’ skeletal development, suggested the twins were either full, or nearly full-term, babies. It appears that the infants’ hunter-gatherer group buried the first twin, then reopened the grave when they buried his brother.

This finding confirms the cultural-historical practice of reopening a grave for the purpose of reburial, which had never been documented before in a Paleolithic burial, the researchers said.

The team also analyzed chemical elements, including isotopes of carbon, nitrogen and barium, in the tooth enamel, revealing that each of the twins was breastfed. Even though the twins’ cousin survived for three months, "stress lines" in his teeth suggest that he had feeding difficulties, perhaps because his mother had a painful breast infection known as mastitis, or maybe because she didn’t survive the birth.

It’s unknown exactly why these infants died, but the deaths of these twins and their cousin were likely painful events for this Paleolithic hunter-gatherer group, who set up camp and buried their babies by the Danube so long ago. "The babies were obviously of particular importance to the group and highly respected and esteemed," Teschler-Nicola told Live Science. The extraordinary burials "seems to imply that the death of the babies was a great loss for the community and their survival."

Source: https://www.livescience.com/oldest-twin-burial-on-record.html?utm_source=Selligent&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=9160&utm_content=LVS_newsletter+&utm_term=2962140&m_i=vHKF6N_PzRC3mEK95pTX3iJyuwiAW5oSX1W4mUouDqafeJditB888QK%2BDRyWsts53smC3Vr%2BCR7dzDJCjF7trIvDk24e266DiBTe%2BhfvvM

2 Photos: Eel eats its way out of a bird’s stomach: Nature is ruthless

[Nature is freaky. Here is an eel eating it's way out of a bird's stomach. The eels often do it with fish. They don't take shit! Nature is nasty. Jan]

A snake eel fighting for its life pulled an "alien" move by bursting out of the stomach of a heron that had just swallowed it whole, according to photos snapped by an amateur photographer in Delaware.

The photos show the snake eel, its head dangling in midair, as the heron — looking surprisingly unbothered — flies onward.

The unusual event attracted a lot of attention among the local predators, said Sam Davis, an engineer from Maryland who took the photos on the Delaware shore. Several juvenile eagles and a fox were following the heron, possibly hoping to scavenge a meal in case the heron or the snake eel didn’t make it, he said.

When Davis first spotted the bizarre flight, he thought that a snake or eel had bitten the heron’s neck. Davis was about 75 yards to 100 yards (68 to 91 meters) away from the animals, but he had a telephoto lens for long-range photography, and so he shot photos as he watched the heron fly about and even land in the water with the eel still attached to it. "The heron didn’t seem to act much differently," Davis told Live Science. "It was in the water and flying around."

Meanwhile, the eel was arching its body, "so i guess it was still alive at some point," he said.

It wasn’t until Davis returned home and edited the photos that he realized that the snake eel wasn’t biting the heron. After enlarging the photos, "I could see the eel, you could see its eyes," he said. "It was actually coming out the other end" — headfirst.

Snake eels are usually known for burrowing out of the stomachs of fish.

The snake eel arches its body. It’s unknown if it survived. (Image credit: Sam Davis)
The photos show "a pretty amazing sight," said John Pogonoski, an ichthyologist with the Australian National Fish Collection at the Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (CSIRO), who wasn’t involved with the heron and snake eel’s encounter. "I would think this is either very rare or very rarely seen in a bird species, at least as far as I am aware."

Earlier this year, Pogonoski and his colleagues published a study in the journal Memoirs of the Queensland Museum on snake eels (a fish from the family Ophichthidae), detailing how snake eels can burrow out of the guts of fish that prey on them. "But usually they don’t get very far," he told Live Science in an email. Once swallowed, snake eels can use their hard heads or tails to bust out of the digestive tract, but usually end up in the predator’s body cavity, muscle tissues or swim bladder. Once trapped, snake eels often "become ‘mummified’ or ‘encysted’ [closed up in a cyst] and die rather than escape," he said.

In one instance, "a co-author of the paper once discovered a live snake eel inside a fish he caught when he cleaned the fish to eat it," Pogonoski said.

Davis never learned what happened to the heron and snake eel photographed in Delaware in 2011 (he uploaded the photos to a wildlife site only a few months ago). When he left the shore, the heron was still flying around with the snake eel hanging below it.

According to Pogonoski, "the heron possibly survived, it didn’t look too inconvenienced, but would depend on how well the wound healed and if it was able to avoid an infection."

As for the snake eel, it "would only have survived if it was dropped over or very close to water with a salinity it could normally tolerate," he said.

Source: https://www.livescience.com/snake-eel-bursts-out-of-heron.html?utm_source=Selligent&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=9160&utm_content=LVS_newsletter+&utm_term=2962140&m_i=cNX86UyNAtkoas7BFD9FL0FBidZHx0KGmu57FAHvRlvZqnITi7UthNDf3TRvjQBRe6ZINOQ%2BI6ajkBamkKYNf0zv0CJyLoPazSYHtRsccI

Source: https://www.livescience.com/snake-eel-bursts-out-of-heron.html?utm_source=Selligent&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=9160&utm_content=LVS_newsletter+&utm_term=2962140&m_i=cNX86UyNAtkoas7BFD9FL0FBidZHx0KGmu57FAHvRlvZqnITi7UthNDf3TRvjQBRe6ZINOQ%2BI6ajkBamkKYNf0zv0CJyLoPazSYHtRsccI

2 Photos: Eel eats its way out of a bird’s stomach: Nature is ruthless

[Nature is freaky. Here is an eel eating it's way out of a bird's stomach. The eels often do it with fish. They don't take shit! Nature is nasty. Jan]

A snake eel fighting for its life pulled an "alien" move by bursting out of the stomach of a heron that had just swallowed it whole, according to photos snapped by an amateur photographer in Delaware.

The photos show the snake eel, its head dangling in midair, as the heron — looking surprisingly unbothered — flies onward.

The unusual event attracted a lot of attention among the local predators, said Sam Davis, an engineer from Maryland who took the photos on the Delaware shore. Several juvenile eagles and a fox were following the heron, possibly hoping to scavenge a meal in case the heron or the snake eel didn’t make it, he said.

When Davis first spotted the bizarre flight, he thought that a snake or eel had bitten the heron’s neck. Davis was about 75 yards to 100 yards (68 to 91 meters) away from the animals, but he had a telephoto lens for long-range photography, and so he shot photos as he watched the heron fly about and even land in the water with the eel still attached to it. "The heron didn’t seem to act much differently," Davis told Live Science. "It was in the water and flying around."

Meanwhile, the eel was arching its body, "so i guess it was still alive at some point," he said.

It wasn’t until Davis returned home and edited the photos that he realized that the snake eel wasn’t biting the heron. After enlarging the photos, "I could see the eel, you could see its eyes," he said. "It was actually coming out the other end" — headfirst.

Snake eels are usually known for burrowing out of the stomachs of fish.

The snake eel arches its body. It’s unknown if it survived. (Image credit: Sam Davis)
The photos show "a pretty amazing sight," said John Pogonoski, an ichthyologist with the Australian National Fish Collection at the Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (CSIRO), who wasn’t involved with the heron and snake eel’s encounter. "I would think this is either very rare or very rarely seen in a bird species, at least as far as I am aware."

Earlier this year, Pogonoski and his colleagues published a study in the journal Memoirs of the Queensland Museum on snake eels (a fish from the family Ophichthidae), detailing how snake eels can burrow out of the guts of fish that prey on them. "But usually they don’t get very far," he told Live Science in an email. Once swallowed, snake eels can use their hard heads or tails to bust out of the digestive tract, but usually end up in the predator’s body cavity, muscle tissues or swim bladder. Once trapped, snake eels often "become ‘mummified’ or ‘encysted’ [closed up in a cyst] and die rather than escape," he said.

In one instance, "a co-author of the paper once discovered a live snake eel inside a fish he caught when he cleaned the fish to eat it," Pogonoski said.

Davis never learned what happened to the heron and snake eel photographed in Delaware in 2011 (he uploaded the photos to a wildlife site only a few months ago). When he left the shore, the heron was still flying around with the snake eel hanging below it.

According to Pogonoski, "the heron possibly survived, it didn’t look too inconvenienced, but would depend on how well the wound healed and if it was able to avoid an infection."

As for the snake eel, it "would only have survived if it was dropped over or very close to water with a salinity it could normally tolerate," he said.

Source: https://www.livescience.com/snake-eel-bursts-out-of-heron.html?utm_source=Selligent&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=9160&utm_content=LVS_newsletter+&utm_term=2962140&m_i=cNX86UyNAtkoas7BFD9FL0FBidZHx0KGmu57FAHvRlvZqnITi7UthNDf3TRvjQBRe6ZINOQ%2BI6ajkBamkKYNf0zv0CJyLoPazSYHtRsccI

Source: https://www.livescience.com/snake-eel-bursts-out-of-heron.html?utm_source=Selligent&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=9160&utm_content=LVS_newsletter+&utm_term=2962140&m_i=cNX86UyNAtkoas7BFD9FL0FBidZHx0KGmu57FAHvRlvZqnITi7UthNDf3TRvjQBRe6ZINOQ%2BI6ajkBamkKYNf0zv0CJyLoPazSYHtRsccI

There could be around 5 billion habitable planets in the Milky Way

Half of the stars in our galaxy that are similar to the sun could be home to an Earth-like planet capable of supporting life.

A team led by Steve Bryson at NASA’s Ames Research Center in California analysed data from the Kepler space telescope, searching for rocky planets within the habitable zone of stars the same size as our sun. The habitable zone is found at the distance from a star where it isn’t too hot or too cold for liquid water to exist.

Based on detections of …

Continue reading at: https://www.newscientist.com/article/2258911-there-could-be-around-5-billion-habitable-planets-in-the-milky-way/

68 million years ago: Squid-like creature that looked like a giant paperclip lived 200 years

Diplomoceras maximumAn artist’s impression of Diplomoceras maximum

James McKay

An ancient squid-like animal with a shell that looked like a 1.5-metre-long paperclip may have typically lived for 200 years.

Diplomoceras maximum lived about 68 million years ago, making it a contemporary of Tyrannosaurus rex. It was an ammonite – a now-extinct group of tentacled cephalopods – and it had a distinctive paperclip-shaped shell.

“It’s hard not to be entranced,” says Linda Ivany at Syracuse University, New York. “It’s as tall as I am.”

D. maximum’s unusual shell shape makes it difficult to unravel its biology, but Ivany and her colleague, Emily Artruc, have now uncovered hints that individuals might have had very long lives. The evidence comes from chemical signatures locked away in samples taken at regular intervals along a 50-centimetre-long section of D. maximum shell.

When she and Artruc examined the carbon and oxygen isotopes along the shell, they found a repeating pattern in the isotopic signatures that they suspect reflects the annual release of methane from the sea floor. This annual pattern matched up with the sculptural ridges, or ribs, perpendicular to the length of the shell. This suggests that D. maximum added one new rib to its shell each year. “These shells grow by accretion, adding a new increment annually,” says Ivany.

Given that a 1.5-metre-long shell contains many dozen ribs, that leads to an obvious conclusion. “The only scenario that seems to work is to make this thing 200 years old,” says Ivany, who presented the research at an online meeting of the Geological Society of America last week.

At first glance, a 200-year-old shellfish might seem unremarkable, given that some modern shellfish can live more than twice as long. But D. maximum was a cephalopod, and all modern cephalopods live fast and die young. Octopuses and squid – even the gigantic forms – live no more than about 5 years. Nautilus, shelled cephalopods, can survive into their twenties. “These are not centenarians,” says Ivany.

Why D. maximum might have had such a long lifespan isn’t clear. It lived around Antarctica, where food must have been difficult to come by during the long and dark winter. Ivany speculates that the ammonite might have had a slow metabolism to cope, and lived a long life as a side effect. Alternatively, a long lifespan might have been an adaptation to maximise the chances of reproducing successfully in such a challenging environment.

Either way, the new evidence for the length of the lifespan will lead to a deeper understanding of the living paperclip’s lifestyle, says Ivany. “If you know something about an organism’s lifespan, you learn a lot about its ecology.”

Source: https://www.newscientist.com/article/2258764-squid-like-creature-that-looked-like-a-giant-paperclip-lived-200-years/

Chart: Nuclear War: How many American & Russian nuclear warheads are there really?

75 years on from the atomic bombing of Hiroshima, more than 13,000 nuclear warheads are still scattered across the world from silos in Montana to isolated corners of European airbases and even to the ocean depths where ballistic missile submarines lurk as a deterrent nearly impossible to detect. Hiroshima was the first of two atomic bombings in 1945 and it involved a 15-kiloton device while the weapon used in the attack on Nagasaki three days later had a 22 kiloton yield. Modern nuclear warheads are far more powerful with the U.S. Trident missile yielding a 455 kiloton warhead while Russia’s SS ICBM has an 800 kiloton yield. Together, the United States and Russia possess more than 90 percent of the world’s nuclear weapons with a stockpile of 8,000 between them, according to the Federation of American Scientists. Active and inactive warheads in military custody are included in that total but it excludes strategic warheads currently deployed at bases for heavy bombers and on intercontinental ballistic missiles.

Even though 8,000 seems like an awfully large number (which it is), it represents a huge reduction on the number of warheads in existence at the height of the Cold War. This infographic shows how stockpiles evolved, particularly when various arms limitation treaties are taken into account. The number of warheads fell significantly in the wake of the Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces Treaty which was signed by the U.S. and USSR in 1987 at a time when both countries possessed more than 60,000 nuclear weapons. The trend towards disarmament continued after the Berlin Wall came down and accelerated when the Soviet Union collapsed. Despite the decline, it isn’t all good news as states are now modernizing their existing stockpiles, adding new types, new delivery systems and committing to possessing the weapons long-term.

Developments in Washington D.C. have added to those worries with the Trump administration leaving the Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces Treaty and now threatening to pull out of New START. That agreement limits the U.S. and Russia to 1,550 deployed nuclear missiles each. The reason cited by President Trump is that China has to be part of any such agreements in the future and so far, Beijing has categorically ruled out any participation. The treaty will expire in February, weeks after the presidential inauguration. Trump has already abandoned the Iran nuclear accord and he recently took the U.S. out of the Open Skies Treaty, blaming Russia for a lack of compliance.

Source: https://www.statista.com/chart/16305/stockpiled-nuclear-warhead-count/?utm_source=Statista+Global&utm_campaign=84df2fffb5-All_InfographTicker_daily_COM_PM_KW42_2020_Fr_COPY&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_afecd219f5-84df2fffb5-308930925

Science: DISCOVERY: An Earth-size planet is careening untethered through the galaxy, scientists find

Nobody has ever seen one here — until now.

Earth orbits the sun like a ship sailing in circles around its anchor. But what if someone — or something — cut that ship loose? Unbound from any star or solar system, what would become of a tiny world flying helplessly and heedlessly through interstellar space? What happens when a planet goes rogue?

Scientists suspect that billions of free-floating or "rogue" planets may exist in the Milky Way, but so far only a handful of candidates have turned up among the 4,000-or-so worlds discovered beyond our solar system. Most of these potential rogue planets appear to be enormous, measuring anywhere from two to 40 times the mass of Jupiter (one Jupiter is equivalent to about 300 Earths). But now, astronomers believe they’ve detected a rogue world like no other: a tiny, free-floating planet, roughly the mass of Earth, gallivanting through the gut of the Milky Way.

This discovery, reported today (Oct. 29) in the Astrophysical Journal Letters, may mark the smallest rogue planet ever detected, and it could help prove a long-standing cosmic theory. According to the study authors, this little world could be the first real evidence that free-floating, Earth-sized planets may be some of the most common objects in the galaxy.

"The odds of detecting such a low-mass object are extremely low," lead study author Przemek Mroz, a postdoctoral scholar at the California Institute of Technology, told Live Science in an email. "Either we were very lucky, or such objects are very common in the Milky Way. They may be as common as stars."

Most exoplanets in our galaxy are visible only because of their host stars. In a literal sense, stars provide the light that allows astronomers to directly observe alien worlds. When a planet is too small or too distant to be seen directly, scientists can still detect it from the slight gravitational pull it exerts on its host star (called the radial velocity method) or by the flickering that occurs when a planet passes in front of the star’s Earth-facing side (the transit method).

Rogue planets, by definition, have no star to light their way — or to light a telescope’s way to them. Instead, detecting rogue planets involves a facet of Einstein’s theory of general relativity known as gravitational lensing. Through this phenomenon, a planet (or even more massive object) acts as a cosmic magnifying glass that temporarily bends the light of objects behind it from Earth’s perspective.

"If a massive object passes between an Earth-based observer and a distant source star, its gravity may deflect and focus light from the source," Mroz explained in a statement. "The observer will measure a short brightening of the source star."

An artist’s impression of a gravitational microlensing event by a free-floating, or rogue, planet. In microlensing, gravity from an object causes the light from a background source to bend, an astronomical phenomenon that shows up as distortions in images taken from Earth.

An artist’s impression of a gravitational microlensing event by a free-floating, or rogue, planet. In microlensing, gravity from an object causes the light from a background source to bend, an astronomical phenomenon that shows up as distortions in images taken from Earth.

The smaller that light-bending object is, the briefer the star’s perceived brightening will be. While a planet several times the mass of Jupiter might create a brightening effect that lasts a few days, a measly planet the mass of Earth will brighten the source star for only a few hours, or less, the researchers said. This exceptionally rare occurrence is called "microlensing."

"Chances of observing microlensing are extremely slim," Mroz added in the statement. "If we observed only one source star, we would have to wait almost a million years to see the source being microlensed."

Fortunately, Mroz and his colleagues weren’t observing just one star for their study — they were watching hundreds of millions of them. Using observations from the Optical Gravitational Lensing Experiment (OGLE), a star survey based at the University of Warsaw in Poland that has turned up at least 17 exoplanets since 1992, the team stared into the center of the Milky Way, looking for any signs of microlensing.

In June 2016, they witnessed the shortest microlensing event ever seen. The star in question, located roughly 27,000 light-years away in the densest part of the galaxy, brightened for just 42 minutes. Calculations showed that the offending object was not bound to any star within 8 astronomical units (AU, or eight times the average distance from Earth to the sun), suggesting it was almost certainly a tiny planet on the run, ejected from its home solar system after a brush with a much more massive object.

Depending on how far away the planet is from the source star (it’s impossible to tell with current technology), the rogue world is likely between one-half and one Earth mass. In either case, this roaming world would be the lowest-mass rogue planet ever detected. According to Mroz, that’s a "huge milestone" for the science of planet formation.

"Theories of planet formation have predicted that the majority of free-floating planets should be of Earth mass or smaller, but this is the first time that we could find such a low-mass planet," Mroz said. "It’s really amazing that Einstein’s theory allows us to detect a tiny piece of rock floating in the galaxy."

Many more tiny pieces of rock may soon follow, study co-author Radek Poleski of the University of Warsaw told Live Science. Future planet-hunting telescopes, like NASA’s Nancy Grace Roman Space Telescope (slated to launch in the mid-2020s), will be much more sensitive to the galaxy’s teensiest microlensing events than the nearly 30-year-old OGLE experiment is, Poleski said. If orphan planets of roughly Earth’s mass are indeed some of the most common denizens of the galaxy, it shouldn’t be long before many more of them turn up.

Source: https://www.livescience.com/earth-size-rogue-planet.html?utm_source=Selligent&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=9160&utm_content=LVS_newsletter+&utm_term=2962140&m_i=9%2BD70384JseVUkDTySKnzRsSSOFoVu%2BHez0XBK33mGCdKfUpBIe6xQ5EMuiiAXrcte_7zFEGeB6T3Ha4xivcox2E_EZXra%2B%2B4ldUCkT99I

Photos: Scientists detected a set of salty lakes on Mars, hidden below south pole glaciers

e44cdba8c5ee47d598387611d1b84e68.jpgMars’s northern ice cap.NASA/JPL-Caltech/MSSS

Scientists have detected a series of saltwater lakes beneath the glaciers of Mars’ southern ice cap. The researchers believe the liquid in these lakes doesn’t freeze and become solid, despite the low temperatures of Mars’ glaciers, due to their extremely high concentrations of salt.

The Mars Express spacecraft, which has been surveying the planet since 2005, had previously detected signs of a subglacial lake basin on Mars’ south pole, but it was unclear whether the lake was liquid or what it contained.

8b6d2d79dc8a45309ccc7530349e266f.jpgThe southern ice cap of Mars, April 17, 2000.NASA/JPL

To find out, a group of Italian, German, and Australian researchers applied a radio-echo technique that Earth satellites use to detect subsurface lakes in Antarctica. They scanned the area multiple times from 2010 to 2019, then published their results in the journal Nature Astronomy on Monday.

The analysis confirmed the liquid-water nature of Mars’ underground lake, as well as its extreme saltiness. What’s more, the researchers say, they uncovered "a more extensive, complex scenario with ubiquitous water patches surrounding the subglacial lake."

The discovery offers yet another possible habitat for life to persist on Mars.

Ancient life may have retreated to underground lakes

Scientists think the Martian surface was once rich with rivers, lakes, and seas, but all the surface water evaporated as a flow of particles from the sun stripped away the planet’s atmosphere. Earth’s strong magnetic field, by contrast, has allowed it to hold onto its atmosphere and its surface water.

On Mars, any microbial life that might have existed on the surface could have migrated underground as water disappeared — perhaps to lakes like the ones beneath the red planet’s south pole.

In July, NASA launched its nuclear-powered Mars Perseverance rover, which is set to search for signs of ancient life on the planet’s surface and prepare Martian rock samples for a future mission that would return them to Earth. The rover is expected to land on Mars on February 18, 2021.

007a6cc46ff64891a72ac2d662fb8ef8.jpgAn artist’s illustration shows NASA’s Perseverance rover and Ingenuity helicopter on Mars.NASA/JPL-Caltech

"Is there life out there? We have, for 20 years, learned about the environment of Mars and are ready to ask that," NASA Administrator Thomas Zurbuchen said during a broadcast of the rover’s launch. "For the first time in decades, [an] astrobiology mission? We’re ready for it."

Source: https://www.businessinsider.co.za/salty-lakes-below-mars-glaciers-2020-9

Photos: The moon has frozen water, NASA just discovered. Mining it may be crucial for travel to Mars

A map of "cold traps" inside shadowy lunar craters at the moon’s south pole (left) and north pole (right). Blue dots show locations where water ice may be present at or near the surface.

The moon is littered with patches of hidden water, NASA researchers have discovered.

That’s great news for the agency’s plans to send astronauts back to the moon, set up a permanent base there, and eventually use it as a stopping point on the way to Mars.

Those ambitions hinge on the ability to mine water ice on the moon and break it down into oxygen and hydrogen to make rocket fuel. Since it’s extremely costly and difficult to launch enough fuel off of Earth to get astronauts to Mars, water on the moon will likely play a critical role in kickstarting a new era of human deep-space exploration.

"You start making gas stations in space. This really starts cutting your dependence on bringing all that fuel from Earth," Angel Abbud-Madrid, director of the Center for Space Resources at the Colorado School of Mines, previously told Business Insider. "That’s really been what’s holding us back from deep-space exploration."

21bb9a077192442a8787dc05708ebd9b.jpgArtist’s concept of astronauts and human habitats on Mars.

Until now, NASA hadn’t known how much water could be available on the moon, or how easy it would be to mine. But two papers published in the journal Nature Astronomy on Monday make the future of lunar ice mining much brighter.

One of the studies confirmed the presence of molecular water in the moon’s surface dust for the first time. The other identified tens of billions of small, cold regions in shadows across the moon where the sun never shines and ice sits comfortably on the surface.

"Both, in different ways, would seem to indicate that there’s more water available on the lunar surface than we’ve been thinking even recently," Leslie Gertsch, a geological engineer at the Missouri University of Science and Technology, and who was not involved in the studies, told Business Insider. "Whether it’s mineable or not is another question."

A space plane detected lunar H2O for the first time

Experts had long thought the moon wouldn’t be a safe place for water, since it has no atmosphere to shield its surface from the sun’s radiation.

But scientists and their spacecraft have been picking up telltale signs of lunar water for the last three decades. First, they found hydrogen lingering over the poles. Then traces of water appeared in lunar-rock samples from the Apollo missions. Later, the Cassini spacecraft picked up signals for water as it glanced at the moon on its way to Saturn.

Finally, in 2018, scientists confirmed water ice sitting on the surface of the moon’s poles. These reservoirs lie in shadowed regions called "cold traps" that sunlight can’t reach.

But there was always a possibility that none of those discoveries were actually water as we know it — H2O — instead of a compound called hydroxyl (OH).

Researchers tend to use the word "water" to describe both compounds, but the oxygen and hydrogen molecules that make up hydroxyl form a much stronger chemical bond than those in H2O.

"If we wanted to extract hydroxyl from a soil to use it for a resource, it would take a lot more energy to break that apart, to create other things like breathable oxygen or water to drink for the astronauts," Casey Honniball, a postdoctoral fellow at NASA’s Goddard Space Flight Center, said in a press briefing. "But with molecular water, if we have that on the moon and we can extract it, that makes it an easier process to get it to other compounds that we would want to use."

To find out whether the moon harbors molecular water or hydroxyl, Honniball hopped on a space plane.

3ac847a0900d43b2a4e51dafdfcf1991.jpgNASA’s Stratospheric Observatory for Infrared Astronomy (SOFIA)NASA

The Stratospheric Observatory for Infrared Astronomy (SOFIA) is a converted Boeing 747 souped up with a 2.7-meter telescope and the ability to fly into the stratosphere. That’s high enough to avoid the atmosphere’s distortion of infrared signals from the moon.

Honniball spent around nine hours in the plane, flying about 40,000 feet above the Earth. She detected the wavelengths of H2O and, surprisingly, they came from a sunlit part of the moon.

That means the water molecules are probably embedded in glass beads that make up about 30% of the lunar soil. Those likely protect H2O from the vaporizing powers of the sun.

Honniball doesn’t know if glass across the entire moon contains water — it could be specific to the region she studied. Either way, though, water molecules embedded in glass beads would not be easy to mine.

"There’s a reason why high-level nuclear waste is planned to be put into glass," Gertsch said. "Glass does not let stuff out easily."

Little shadows could harbor water across the moon

80a2afa957b14323b12f02f4f6b48fed.jpgMountains on the moon, seen by NASA’s Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter.NASA/GSFC/Arizona State University

Until now, the best known caches of lunar water are those in the large, permanently shadowed regions at the poles — the coldest spots ever measured in our solar system.

But in digging through thousands of photos from NASA’s Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter, a group of researchers found smaller regions of permanent shadow littering the moon’s surface.

Paul Hayne, a planetary scientist at the University of Colorado Boulder who led the study, likened the discovery to the process of "turning over a rock and finding all the gazillions of insects that skitter away." He estimates that there are tens of billions of these "micro cold traps" surrounding the moon’s poles.

Hayne’s team did not look for water in these regions, but previous research already confirmed the presence of water ice in the large shadows on the poles.

"If there’s water in these larger cold traps, then there should be water in the smaller ones too," Hayne told Business Insider.

This means that mining machines could theoretically stay in the sunlight — and avoid extreme freezing temperatures — while dredging ice from micro traps.

"You could go to a place in these polar regions and stand in the sunlight and bend over, or use a tool to extract water from one of these much smaller shadows that’s much more accessible," Hayne said.

All in all, Hayne’s team estimates that shadowed cold-trap regions cover about 0.15% of the moon’s surface.

346c4b7b240248c496ea956dc7197a2a.jpgThe moon as viewed by NASA’s Mariner 10 in 1973.NASA/JPL/Northwestern University

If these micro cold traps are filled with water, that would make moon mining easier, since they extend away from the poles and it’s easier to land a spacecraft near the moon’s equator.

But Gertsch warned that big questions about lunar ice remain. Although both of these discoveries are "enticing," she said, we can’t really know the nature of the lunar ground until "we go up there and mess around."

NASA is sending a water-hunting rover to the moon’s South Pole

14ba88c70a8b411aa0162d83be61179f.jpgAn illustration of NASA’s Volatiles Investigating Polar Exploration Rover (VIPER) on the surface of the moon.NASA Ames/Daniel Rutter

To investigate lunar water up close, NASA is preparing to launch a drill and mass-measuring instrument to the moon’s South Pole in 2022. Once there, it will try to harvest water ice.

Then in 2023, NASA aims to launch the VIPER (short for Volatiles Investigating Polar Exploration Rover), which will trundle over rocky terrain, drilling into sections of moon ice and soil for analysis. Over the course of its 100-day lifespan, the rover’s main goal is to collect data for NASA to map out the moon’s water resources.

03b71c1589464e73b4f6cb0313880c10.jpgAn illustration shows Astrobotic’s Griffin lunar lander deploying a ramp on the moon’s surface.Astrobotic

Given their more accessible locations, Hayne’s micro cold traps could be ideal targets for these missions.

Honniball’s team, meanwhile, has requested 72 more hours on the SOFIA plane for further lunar observations.

But if NASA really wants to set up a moon-mining operation, it will have a lot more work to do.

"It takes more than one rover," Gertsch said. "You can’t just send one prospector on a donkey out into the mountains and expect to design a mine from that."

Source: https://www.businessinsider.co.za/nasa-scientists-discover-moons-hidden-water-stores-2020-10

Video: INCREDIBLE Genius: Nikola Tesla’s amazing Turbine!!!

[I've been watching some videos of the Tesla turbine and began asking myself: How does this thing actually work? The answer will astound and amaze you. And to think that this thing was invented in 1909 and has … until now … not had a practical use! It was originally invented to be used as a steam engine. Don't knock steam power … nuclear submarines and aircraft carriers function on STEAM POWER generated by heat from nuclear power! So a nuclear powered submarine is really a STEAM POWERED submarine! Ditto for an aircraft carrier! Gasoline engines killed the possibilities of this engine. However, look very carefully at this video describing how this little turbine works and you'll be amazed by the unbelievable sophistication of the thinking of this man long before the age of computers, etc. How he even conceived of such a complex idea leaves me astounded! Watch the description carefully. Then they also have a tiny Tesla turbine which they run and you see it in action. What makes this little machine even more INCREDIBLE, is its speed of rotation, and even more amazingly, the faster it turns … THE MORE POWER IT GENERATES AND THE FASTER IT WANTS TO GO! Tesla, in his time found that it went so fast that it broke any known metal or alloy he could find!!! In the video, it spins up to an incredible 80,000 RPM!!! But this little machine has other features. It is reversible. It can run equally efficiently both forwards and backwards! Even more astounding, you can reverse it completely and use it as a pump! I find it hard to believe that there are no uses for it. This turbine is beyond imagination. Watch this short video and let it blow your mind! Jan]

Here’s the video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mrnul6ixX90